:: Volume 2, Issue 3 (2-2018) ::
qaiie 2018, 2(3): 7-40 Back to browse issues page
The Nature of Discourse Making of the Islamic Revolution’s Doctrines and Its Characteristics in the Curricula of the Educational System of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Hamideh Pakmehr1, Maghsoud Amin Khandaghi PhD 2, Seyed Javad Ghandili PhD3, Mahmood Saeidi Rezvani PhD3
1- Ph.D. student of curriculum studies, Faculty of Education, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Iran
2- Associate professor of curriculum studies, Faculty of Education, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. , aminkhandaghi@gmail.com
3- Assistant professor curriculum studies, Faculty of Education, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Iran.
Abstract:   (4199 Views)
The present study was undertaken to investigate the nature of discourse making of the Islamic revolution’s doctrines and its characteristics in the curricula of the educational system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The method of this qualitative inquiry was analytical. The population of the study comprised all relevant databases that were identified at first, then were studied purposefully and deeply as well as analyzed continuously. At first, the nature of discourse making was probed and the findings indicated ten basic characteristics with an emphasis on ideology, identifying floating and contradicting signifiers with ideology, paying attention to human nature, social acceptability, planning, hegemony, demandingness, accessibility, discourse making as technology of soft power and attention to political-social requirements. In addition, the theoretical consequences of discourse making approach in curricula were studied in terms of macro/basic and technical/special perspectives and also practical consequences were examined in terms of the aforementioned approach, according to three areas of knowledge, attitude and performance of learners in facing with the Islamic revolution’s doctrines and enhancing soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran through the curricula
Keywords: discourse making, ideology, doctrine, Islamic revolution, curriculum, education, Islamic Republic of Iran
Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (696 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: special-Philosophical
Received: 2016/11/21 | Accepted: 2017/11/27 | Published: 2018/02/17
1. Armstrong, P. (2015). The discourse of Michel Foucault: A sociological encounter. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 29-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.10.009]
2. Avineri, N. (2015). Yiddish language socialization across communities: Ideologies. Religion, and variation. [Special Issue]. Language & Communication, 42,135-140. [DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2014.12.006]
3. Badea, C., Er-rafiy, A., Chekroun, P., Légal, J.B., & Gosling, P. (2015). Ethnic in-group evaluation and adhesion to acculturation ideologies: The case of Moroccan immigrants in France. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 47-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.01.003]
4. Betz, C. T. (2011). ITIL®, COBIT® and CMMI®: Ongoing confusion of process and function. BP Trends, 1-13.
5. Birou, A., Henry, P., & Schlegel, J. P. (Eds.) (2016). Towards a re-definition of development: Essays and discussion on the nature of development in an international perspective. UK: Elsevier.
6. Chimonas, S. (2000). Moral panics: Towards a new model. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.
7. Davies, L., & Leonard, P. (Eds.) (2004). Social work in a corporate era: Practices of power and resistance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
8. Foucault, M. (2002). Archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
9. Gee, J. P. (2015). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.). London: Psychology Press.
10. Glatthorn, A. A., Jailall, J. M., & Jailall, J. K. (2016). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11. Groddeck, V., & Schwarz, J.O. (2013). Perceiving megatrends as empty signifiers: A discourse-theoretical interpretation of trend management. Futures, 47, 28-37. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2013.01.004]
12. Gustafsson, A., Lassbo, G., Risenfors, S. (2014). Have computer – Will travel: A discourse analysis of a 1:1 initiative in upper secondary school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 182-187. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.032]
13. Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. R. Howarth, A. J. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis, Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change (pp. 1-23). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
14. Iovenko, A. (2015). The ideology and development of the Social-National Party of Ukraine, and its transformation into the All-Ukrainian ::union:: "Freedom," in 1990–2004. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(2–3), 229-237. [DOI:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.06.010]
15. Jacobs, H. H. (Ed.). (2010). Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. Alexandria, Va: ASCD.
16. Jorgensen, M., & Phillips. L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781849208871]
17. Juffermans, K., Asfaha, Y. M., & Abdelhay, A. K. (2014). African literacies: Ideologies, scripts, education. Newcastle:Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
18. Kanira, E. (2002). The contribution of drama in education to discourse-making and language development in the Foundation Stage curriculum. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
19. Kirkham, K. (2016). The formation of the Eurasian Economic ::union::: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 22 April 2016.
20. Knight, P. T. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369-381. [DOI:10.1080/13562510120061223]
21. Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
22. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
23. Limerick, N. (2012). Recontextualizing ideologies about social difference in New York Spanish-language newspaper advertising. Language & Communication, 32(4), 312-328. [DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.006]
24. Mannay, D. (2015). Achieving respectable motherhood? Exploring the impossibility of feminist and egalitarian ideologies against the everyday realities of lived Welsh working-class femininities. Women's Studies International Forum, 53, 159-166. [DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.020]
25. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
26. Prideaux, D. (2003). Curriculum design. British Medical Journal, 326(7383), 268-270. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.326.7383.268]
27. Rasula, J. (1989). The poetics of embodiment: A theory of exceptions, Volume 2. California: University of California.
28. Schriewer, J. (2012). Discourse formation in comparative education (4th ed.). New York: Oxford.
29. Seydullayeva, G.A., Orynkhanova, G.A., & Tazhibayeva, Sh.A. (2015). Concept of "modernization" in a political discourse of modern Kazakhstan: On the example of messages of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the people of Kazakhstan. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 72-76. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00840-0]
30. Uchiyama, K. P., & Radin, J. L. (2009). Curriculum mapping in higher education: A vehicle for collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 33(4), 271-280. [DOI:10.1007/s10755-008-9078-8]
31. Van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781446289068]
32. Wuthnow, R. (2009). Communities of discourse: Ideology and social structure in the reformation, the enlightenment, and European socialism. London: Harvard University Press.
33. Yun, S. H., & Kim, J.N. (2008). Soft power: From ethnic attraction to national attraction in sociological globalism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 565- 577. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.09.001]

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Volume 2, Issue 3 (2-2018) Back to browse issues page