Peer Review Process
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Ethical standards are crucial to ensure the high quality of scientific publications, credibility of scientific findings, and that authors receive credit for their work. The details of publication ethics incorporated in the journal are as follows:
Initial Screening (1-10)days
All the manuscripts submitted , goes under the initial checking process. During the initial screening, journal editors mainly check the following:
Does the manuscript fit the Journal’s scope and aim and will be of interest to the readership?
Dose the manuscript fully represents the applied issues in islamic education ?
Is the manuscript of minimum acceptance quality and writing good enough to make it worth reviewing?
Once a manuscript clears the above-mentioned initial screening, it is sent for double blind peer review in which names of reviewers and authors are not revealed to each other. A minimum of 2 peer reviewers (up to 4) are chosen for the peer review. Peer reviewers are ideally experts in their field.
The peer review is completed once all the reviewers send the journal a detailed report with their comments on the manuscript and their recommendation.
Editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision to adopt or reject article.after adopt . article will published